(“When Blake writes Ībout ‘the Sublime of the Bible,’ it is not the Bible itself that functions as a sublime object: instead, Have not searched for electronic publications, and I report here only those I have happened upon which appear To operate a computer, such as reviews invited for the listings of the book-sale firm of, which areĭivided into those by (1) the author, (2) the publisher, and (3) other, perhaps disinterested, remarkers. Some electronic publications, however, suggest no more knowledge than how Parkhurst, Jr., on Fuseli and Flaxman and by Geoffrey Keynes onīlake (1966).
To be merely electronic versions of physically stable works, such as Colliers Encyclopedia-CD The status of electronic “publications” becomes increasingly vexing. June-6 Sept 1998 (4) Blake Festival as part of the annual Olavfestdagene (Trondheim, Norway), 25-28 Julyįurniture with inscriptions, microforms, music, pillows, poems, posters, published scores, recorded readingsĪnd singings, rubber stamps, T-shirts, tattoos, video-recordings, or email related to Blake.
#Haiki feldman series#
& His Circle,” exhibition and lecture series at the Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery (England), 22 calendars,įestivals and lecture series, 4 ↤ 4 E.g., (1) “Blake and the Book,” Strawberry Hill (England), 18 Aprilġ998 (2) “Blake Course at the Tate Gallery” (London, England), 12 May-9 June 1998 (3) “William Blake Or television broadcasts, 3 ↤ 3 See Sarah Joyce, review of “South Bank Show Documentary on Blake.ĭirected by David Thomas. Essick, “Blake in the Marketplace, 1998,”īlake ). Produced by Coalport for the 1978 Tate exhibition (see R. I have made no systematic attempt to record manuscripts and typescripts,Ĭhinaware, 2 ↤ 2 For example, the white bone china bud vase decorated with “The Sick Rose” apparently Wordsworth and Edmund Burke such major figures are dealt with more comprehensively elsewhere, and the light It does not include importantĬontemporaries with whom Blake’s contact was negligible or non-existent such as John Constable and William George Richmond, Thomas Stothard, and John Varley. It includes Thomas Butts, Robert Hartley Cromek, George Cumberland, John Flaxman and hisįamily, Henry Fuseli, Thomas and William Hayley, John Linnell and his family, Samuel Palmer, James Parker, This division is organized by individual (say, William Hayley or John Flaxman), with works byĪnd about Blake’s friends and patrons, living individuals with whom he had significant direct andĭemonstrable contact. and have noted significant differences from them. (1995), faute de mieux, to be the standard bibliographical authorities on Blake 1 ↤ 1 Except for the states of the plates for Blake’s commercial book engravings, I take Blake Books (1977) and Blake Books Supplement These reviews are listed under the book reviewed the authors of the reviews Reviews listed here are only for books which are substantially about Blake, not for those with Listed in one place, with cross-references to their authors.
Note: Collections of essays on Blake and issues of periodicals devoted entirely to him are Section A: Original Editions and ReprintsĬriticism, Biography, and Scholarly Studies The organization of the checklist is as follows: Division I: William BlakeĮditions, Translations, and Facsimiles of Blake’s Writings Publications for the current year (say, 1998) and those for previous years which are not recorded inīlake Books (1977), Blake Books Supplement (1995), and “William Blake and The annual checklist of scholarship and discoveries concerning William Blake and his circle records With the Assistance of Keiko Aoyama for Japanese ↑ back to top William Blake and His Circle: A Checklist of Publications and Discoveries in
0 kommentar(er)
